From the one-hour diagnostic to the architecture engagement. Each one stops exactly where it says it will.
The four prices below are published, and they hold for everyone: the same rate, whatever your context.
Each format ends with a deliverable that belongs to you. A diagnostic concluding “these are your three risks, your team can handle them alone” is a successful diagnostic: you have what you need to decide — and that is what lets you believe me the day I recommend going further.
| Format | Duration | Price | What you leave with |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is your AI-generated code ready for production? | 1 hour, by video | €200 excl. VAT | Within 24 hours, a written and prioritised list of your three main risks |
| AI-generated codebase audit: what holds, what has to be redone | 3 days | €2,400 excl. VAT | A written report: what to keep, what to redo, what to throw away |
| Putting the guardrails in: code, deployment, AI agents | 5 days | €4,000 excl. VAT | The apparatus in place and proven on your code |
| Architecture engagement | per day | €800 excl. VAT / day | The decisions written down, with what they cost and what they close off |
Prices excluding VAT. Quote and invoice issued by the company for any service booked directly. My written commitments on access to your code are annexed to the quote, where they carry contractual force.
Each format can be taken on its own; they follow one another where that is useful.
Founder, product lead or technical director, with a prototype or a first version that has a threshold to cross.
Founder or technical director whose product is already running, and who has to answer to someone — an investor, an enterprise client, a board — for what happens next.
Technical director or team lead whose developers work with AI tools.
Founder or director committing several months of development to structural choices, and who would rather write them down beforehand than discover them afterwards.
For a one-hour service, nobody should have to open their code repository — the folder where their project lives — to someone they are meeting for the first time. The right answer is to design the session so it can do without access, rather than asking you to trust me.
I send you a reading script suited to your language. You run it yourself, on your own machine. It writes nothing into your project — its only write is a temporary system folder, deleted automatically on exit. It contacts no server. It installs nothing. It executes none of your project’s code.
It produces about a hundred lines of measurements: volume, a summarised Git history (no commit messages, no author names), apparent duplication, the state of the tests, dependencies and version ranges, deployment configuration, documentation, and an inventory of the places where a secret appears to be written — their location, their type, their number of occurrences. Never their value: the script is built to be incapable of it, it counts and it locates, it does not display.
It runs to six hundred lines. I will not promise you it can be read through in two minutes, which would be untrue. Its header lists precisely the commands that do not appear in it — no network access, no writing into the repository — so that you can check it yourself rather than take my word. That check takes thirty seconds.
The result goes into a text file, on your machine. Open it before sending it to me: I encourage you to. If a line troubles you, delete it and send the rest — I will tell you in the session if I miss it.
You can also come without sending anything. The session is then run as shared reading: “let us look together” rather than “here is what I found”. We cover two or three areas of the project, and my observations are hypotheses your team confirms afterwards. That is useful, and it is a different thing — better to know beforehand.
Three days of analysis cannot be done over someone’s shoulder. My commitments are then written down, annexed to the quote, and they carry contractual force.
On the confidentiality agreement: if you have one, send it. I read it, I tell you what I accept, and I sign if it is reasonable.
These commitments and this note on AI use fit on one page. Ask for them before signing anything.
If you are hesitating between two formats, take the smaller one: it gives you what you need to decide on the next.
Design Horizon & Development, a limited company registered in France. Prices excluding VAT. Remote work from Montpellier, travel possible. Quote and invoice issued by the company for any service booked directly.
We use cookies solely for the site to work properly. With your agreement, we also enable the Calendly scheduling module, which sets its own cookies. You can change your mind at any time from the footer. Learn more